"Using" for javascript

Загрузчиков JS все прибывает

«XOR's Post» — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:39:02 GMT

Довольно давно я писал про «Using» для яваскрипта . С тех пор мы успели сделать свой продвинутый загрузчик

re: "Using" for javascript

Andrew Mayorov — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:56:02 GMT

Great!

re: "Using" for javascript

Jon Davis — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:30:35 GMT

Implemented. I also added zero-registration late loading:

using('url(cachefile.net/.../jquery-1.2.3.js)', function() {

$(document).ready(function() {

alert("document loaded");

});

re: "Using" for javascript

Jon Davis — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:26:15 GMT

"But look, while we stay on one page is it really big advantage over simple: using( 'jquery', 'jquery-blockUI', function ... ?"

So all args that preced the callback function, they being strings, are dependency names. Easy enough to add, I'll add it tonight. ;)

re: "Using" for javascript

Andrew Mayorov — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:56:01 GMT

Hi Jon! For me it's always harder to write about something, than code it. So our synchronization makes me think about noosphere again. :)

You are right, it's impossible to do so with my approach. But look, while we stay on one page is it really big advantage over simple:

using( 'jquery', 'jquery-blockUI', function ... ?

I think that dependencies start to really shine if you can specify them right in the file you are "using". But neither mine, nor your approach allows for this. At least, now.

re: "Using" for javascript

Jon Davis — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:28:31 GMT

"How should we register script dependencies in this case?"

Ironically, just as you posted, I posted a rewrite of using.js so that it can handle dependencies, like so:

using("jquery", "jquery-1.2.3.js");

using.register("jquery-blockUI", "/jquery-blockUI.js")

.requires("jquery");

// load jquery and jquery-blockUI at the same time:

using ("jquery-blockUI", function() {

$.blockUI();

});

At that point it's really up to the developer to maintain consistency in naming conventions and dependency declarations.